USDC to USDT Swap Exploited with a $215k Loss, How Does MEV Attack Stablecoin Trades?

By: blockbeats|2025/03/13 04:15:02
0
Share
copy
Original Article Title: Crypto trader gets sandwich attacked in stablecoin swap, loses $215K
Original Article Author: Brayden Lindrea, Cointelegraph Author
Original Article Translation: ChatGPT

Editor's Note: This article covers a sandwich attack incident that occurred in a cryptocurrency trade, where a trader lost over $215,000 during a stablecoin exchange. The article provides a detailed account of the attack, including how MEV bots profited through frontrunning and discusses potential money laundering activities. Additionally, it mentions the protective measures taken by the Uniswap platform to prevent such attacks and clarifies initial criticisms.

Below is the original content (slightly rephrased for better readability):

On March 12, a crypto trader fell victim to a sandwich attack while transferring $220,764 in stablecoins, losing nearly 98% of its value, amounting to $215,000, which was captured by a MEV bot.

A $220,764 USDC stablecoin value was swapped to $5,271 Tether USDT within 8 seconds, as the MEV bot successfully front-ran the transaction, profiting over $215,500 from it.

Data from the Ethereum block explorer shows that this MEV attack occurred in the USDC-USDT liquidity pool of the decentralized exchange Uniswap v3, with assets worth $19.8 million locked in the pool.

USDC to USDT Swap Exploited with a 15k Loss, How Does MEV Attack Stablecoin Trades?

Details of the Sandwich Attack Transaction Source: Etherscan

According to Michael Nadeau, the founder of The DeFi Report, the MEV bot front-ran by swapping out all USDC liquidity from Uniswap v3's USDC-USDT pool and then putting it back after the transaction execution.

Nadeau stated that the attacker paid a $200,000 fee to the Ethereum block builder "bob-the-builder.eth" from the $220,764 transaction and pocketed $8,000 for themselves.

DeFi researcher "DeFiac" speculated that the same trader using different wallets may have experienced a total of six sandwich attacks, citing "internal tools" as evidence. They noted that all funds were sourced from the Aave lending protocol before being deposited into Uniswap.

Two wallets fell victim to MEV sandwich attacks around 9 a.m. UTC on March 12th. Ethereum wallet addresses "0xDDe…42a6D" and "0x999…1D215" were sandwich attacked in transactions that occurred three to four minutes apart, resulting in losses of $138,838 and $128,003, respectively.

These two traders conducted trades in the Uniswap v3 liquidity pool similar to a trader exchanging $220,762.

Speculation arose that these transactions might be related to money laundering.

0xngmi, the founder of the crypto data dashboard DefiLlama, stated, "If you have NK illicit funds, you can construct a transaction that is very easily exploited by MEV and privately send it to an MEV bot, allowing them to arbitrage in a bundle. This way, you can wash all the money with close to zero loss."

While Nadeau initially criticized Uniswap, he later acknowledged that these transactions did not originate from Uniswap's frontend, which has MEV protection and default slippage settings.

After Uniswap CEO Hayden Adams and others clarified the protective measures taken by Uniswap to prevent sandwich attacks, Nadeau retracted those criticisms.

"Original Article Link"

-- Price

--

You may also like

Former ByteDance employee's account: How I started with two Pinduoduo hard drives and made six times the profit with Seagate to achieve financial freedom?

A programmer from a big tech company bought hard drives on Pinduoduo and, following clues, managed to accurately capture the sixfold rising stock Seagate using the "finding daily anomalies + 13F institutional verification" framework, making a wild profit of $400,000 and achieving financial freedom.

MiCA reshuffle begins, Binance temporarily bids farewell to the EU

What Binance leaves behind is not scattered retail investors, but a whole batch of high-value users who are forced to liquidate and have almost nowhere to go.

How does Gate redo "buying and selling stocks" from the cryptocurrency world to the stock market?

The competition logic of exchanges has changed.

Visa and Mastercard join 140 giants to launch a new stablecoin, but the impact on the market landscape may still be limited

As an important milestone event in the stablecoin landscape, OUSD is likely to change the existing stablecoin landscape and significantly increase the adoption rate of stablecoins in the global financial system.

Circle CEO responds to OUSD's challenge: Stablecoins are a winner-takes-all business, and we will not slow down

OUSD was jointly launched by more than 140 giants, causing Circle's stock price to plummet in a single day. Circle's CEO personally wrote a response, clarifying USDC's moat from three aspects: network effects, liquidity, and regulation, and dismantling OUSD's three selling points of "free redemption...

Argentina vs Cape Verde: When a Record-Breaking Legend Meets an Unbreakable Underdog

WEEX exclusive pre-match analysis of Argentina vs Cape Verde, exploring Messi-led Argentina’s dominance and Cape Verde’s historic defensive breakout, with a breakdown of volatility, structure, and match dynamics.

Contents

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more
iconiconiconiconiconiconicon
Customer Support:@weikecs
Business Cooperation:@weikecs
Quant Trading & MM:bd@weex.com
VIP Program:support@weex.com